Equality Through Double-Standards

Although men are commonly likened to dogs and there are plenty of books and articles about how to train your man as if he were a dog, if one person applies the exact same idea to women then we feminists must scream for his head on a platter.

But we feminists can occasionally object to the characterization of men as dogs on a very narrow technicality: it could be remotely interpreted as helping to excuse male bad behavior. But except for that, calling men dogs is an otherwise inoffensive statement and does not deserve censure.

That principle is almost worthy enough to include it with The Sweet Pink Rules of Feminism, is it not?