The Kid Should’ve Laid-Back and Enjoyed It

Another case of misidentifying the real victim:

A 37-year-old [female] day care worker was arrested for allegedly raping and sexually abusing a four-year-old boy, police say.

We all know that womyn, saintly creatures that we are, would NEVER rape or sexually abuse anyone. But if there was sexual misconduct, then there’s only one reasonable explanation: the 4-year old asked for it.

Sources tell us in what amounts to a bizarre confession that the suspect is actually accusing the four-year-old boy of seducing her. But police are not buying that explanation as they investigate several instances of rape and sexual abuse inside the day care center over a six-week period.

See? And womyn never lie about rape or sexual abuse, especially when they’re the ones accused of doing it. The victim is to blame in this case.

In fact, I’ll bet he raped her! The drooling bastard.

And what about this double-standard about molestation of children? I mean, if a 37-year-old man had sex with a 4 year old girl, would he be considered a sicko? Of course he wouldn’t! The Patriarchy would probably give him a slap on the wrist and there would be no outrage at all. Right?

Oh, but when a womyn pedophile has sex with an underage boy, society really ought to compassionately understand the circumstances which compelled her do it. She was only filling an emotional void in her life and the 4 year old was being way too coquettish.

No, I don’t think you’ll be hearing much anger among us feminists about this particular instance of victim-blaming. A victim with a penis is no victim at all because equality is the overriding principle which guides feminists at all times, donchaknow.